Labor is a vital factor in the productivity and development of a society

Since the beginning of history, work has been an essential activity for human life. Human
beings can satisfy their basic needs and develop their potential through work. However, work
has not always been a voluntary activity. For many centuries, forced labor was the norm, and
human beings were enslaved or forced to work in conditions of semi-slavery.

As history progressed, more and more labor rights were established to protect workers from
abuse and exploitation. Today, however, it appears that these rights are becoming
increasingly vulnerable.

Unethical labor practices and disenfranchised industries

Labor exploitation is a form of modern-day slavery, becoming an increasingly severe
problem worldwide. According to estimates by the International Labor Organization (ILO),
around 21 million people are victims of labor slavery worldwide. This means more
people are enslaved today than at any other time in history.

Victims of labor exploitation are often people in vulnerable situations, such as migrants,
homeless people, women, and children. Violence against the LGBT community is also rising,
with gays, lesbians, and transgender people being the most affected and violated.

In many cases, migrants are especially vulnerable to labor exploitation, as they may find
themselves in a foreign country without having the necessary documents to work legally.
This makes them dependent on their employer, which makes them highly vulnerable to
exploitation.

On the other hand, women and children are often victims of sexual exploitation, which is also
a form of modern slavery.

A silent pandemic

According to Unicef estimates, around 2 million children are victims of sexual exploitation
worldwide. This means that more than 5,000 children are victims of this type of exploitation
every year.

Labor and sexual exploitation are just some of the many problems workers face around the
world face. Other common problems include child labor, forced labor, and hazardous and
unhealthy working conditions.

In Europe today, more and more measures are being taken to protect workers’ labor rights.
In particular, efforts are being made to improve the situation of migrants working on the
continent.

For example, in 2018, the Intra-European Workers Directive was adopted, establishing a
legal framework for migrant workers in Europe. The directive aims to encourage the work
and mobility of workers on the continent while protecting their labor rights.
Measures are also being taken to protect children from labor exploitation. In particular,
efforts are being made to eradicate child labor worldwide.

According to the ILO, child labor is a problem that affects 168 million children worldwide.
See the following article.

https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_747587/lang–es/index.htm
In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development, which aims to eradicate child labor worldwide. In particular, efforts are being
made to halve the number of working children.
Italy is currently at the forefront of this effort. It has managed to reduce the number of
working children in the country by 80%.
Society has long wanted to protect the family as a fundamental pillar of its development.
However, with time and changing circumstances, this protection has been eroded.

The world demands good working conditions.

Society is constantly changing and developing, and with it, new policies that protect citizens
and families and their traditional values, which means that social welfare must constantly be
evolving to meet the new demands and needs of the environment.

This is why social development has positioned itself as a priority for governments worldwide.
It is an area in constant change and movement where laws and solutions must be
continuously adjusted to ensure the population’s welfare.

Changes in the social sphere directly affect people’s quality of life, and it is, therefore,
essential that they are taken into account to ensure a better future for all.

Sources:

International Year for the Elimination of Child Labour

Child labour rises to 160 million – first increase in two decades

International Labour Organization

Syria and Lebanon’s currency catastrophe aggravates their economic and social crisis

The causes of the double collapse of the Lebanese (LL) and Syrian (LS) pound are manifold: depletion of revenue sources, multiple and colossal public deficits, absence of governance – even government – endemic corruption and nihilistic politicians, in a context of instability and regional conflicts. Both countries have divergent political and economic systems. Lebanon’s is ultra-liberal, corrupt to the core and, of course, pro-Western. Syria’s is more planned, with a certain liberal twist – and a dose of corruption – over the past decades, before the war unleashed in 2011 destroyed everything in its path.

That ten-year war left deep fractures, impossible to fill without gigantic international aid, which is scarce due to Western financial and economic sanctions. Syria’s rulers – the same autocratic family that has been in power for half a century – reduced hopes for a better life to nothing.

But although Lebanon and Syria have taken different paths, they share many commonalities. Many Lebanese families have Syrian relatives, and vice versa. Several Syrian families contributed to the development in Lebanon of a long thriving banking sector, and dynamic relationships have been woven in the industrial sector. In the early 2000s, some Lebanese banks took stakes or created subsidiaries in Syria, where a timid liberalization of the financial sector was taking shape.

Neither with you nor without you

It should also be recalled that both countries shared the same currency until January 24, 1948, when Lebanon created its own currency after its independence and dissolving any legal relationship with the French Mandatory Power and Syria. In 1950, Syria in turn abolished the customs union between the two countries.

Since October 2019, the Lebanese pound on the official market, which as a guarantee of stability is tied to the dollar (at a rate of 1,507 pounds to the dollar), keeps sinking to abysmal levels on the parallel markets. Its depreciation currently reaches 90%, with an exchange rate on the informal market bordering on 15,000 pounds to the dollar (against 9,800 in July 2020). No one knows when the fall will stop, while the country has been without a government since August, when an explosion in the port of Beirut destroyed an entire neighborhood of the capital and led to the resignation of a government charged with initiating reforms.

“With these insensitive policymakers, we have the feeling of being in contact with a huge boulder or a steel wall,” says Jad Tabet, a civil society figure and secretary general of the Engineers and Architects Syndicate, bitterly. The banks, which were the jewel and engine of the economy before 2018, are on the verge of bankruptcy and prohibit in complete illegality the withdrawal of dollars from bank accounts, except in dribs and drabs and at a disadvantageous rate. In a largely “dollarized” and import-dependent economy, traders suffer, and bankruptcies and unemployment multiply.

In this context, the outgoing Prime Minister, Hassan Diab, warned that the reserves of the Bank of Lebanon (BDL) could not finance all subsidies (wheat, fuel, medicines, medical supplies and foodstuffs) beyond the month of June.

“Living in an illusion”.

Hardship or bankruptcy? The most surprising thing is that the Lebanese banks were swimming in income thanks to deposits from the Lebanese themselves, from expatriates, from the Gulf monarchies and from Syria. For that country, Lebanon was at once a safety valve, a refuge and a place from which industrialists and traders could carry out their operations while benefiting from attractive interest rates until 2019. Everything seemed to be going smoothly before the shipwreck, and the accumulated revenue losses of the Lebanese state and the inability of the monetary authorities to balance the abysmal balance of payments deficit turned out to be the main factor in the crisis. No more foreign currency was coming in, while countries such as Saudi Arabia were reluctant to place their surpluses in the country.

In fact, the BDL encouraged local banks to increase their interest rates to balance the deficits of the public utilities, which were accumulating mountains of debt ($60 billion, or 49 billion euros, in the electricity sector alone). The warnings of experts and international institutions about the situation, which had become unsustainable (the debt-to-GDP ratio had been close to 180% for years), had no effect, since in the short term nothing is more reassuring than blindness.

Thus, a few months after the protests of the northern autumn of 2019 and the draconian measures of the banks, which penalized their depositors by limiting access to their accounts, Prime Minister Hassan Diab announced on March 7, 2020 that for the first time in its history, the country was declaring itself insolvent on a part of its public debt (overdue Eurobonds for $1.2 billion or 999 million euros). It thus sent a very negative signal to the financial markets. “The Lebanese lived in the illusion that everything was fine, while Lebanon was drowning in an ocean of debts,” the prime minister added.

The same month, the Lebanese state declared its insolvency on the whole of its foreign currency debt: $35.8 billion (32 billion euros) on a total debt of $95.5 billion (79 billion euros) by the end of November 2020.

Those who advised more prudence were not listened to. The ship was sinking and panic reigned on board. In July 2020, Alain Bifani, former director general of finance, was claiming that despite tight restrictions and a ban on capital transfers, nearly $6 billion (€5 billion) had fled the country since October 2019

Guilty parties were needed. BDL Governor Riad Salameh and bankers were designated as responsible for a flawed and vicious system that could only endure with unrealistic rates applied to duped customers and in many cases with no other source of income in a near-paralyzed country.

Flattered, then despised

Today, confidence has evaporated. Crowned with glory until yesterday by international financial circles, which attributed to him the highest mark as head of the central bank for his management, Riad Salameh – accused of having implemented a Ponzi scheme, a fraudulent financial construction – is now singled out for his “calamitous” performance, although his mistakes must also be shared by the politicians and the system he helped to build.

The Lebanese judiciary has just opened a preliminary investigation into illegal transfers of funds from the bank’s governor to Switzerland, at the request of the Swiss judiciary. Riad Salameh – who was for a long time the personal business banker of Rafiq Hariri, former Prime Minister and businessman at the time when he worked for the American investment bank Merrill Lynch – denied any professional misconduct.

At the same time, many depositors, considering themselves wronged, initiated legal proceedings against Lebanese banks for their actions and against the BDL, long regarded as an untouchable fortress, a sort of State within the State.

Is there any ray of light in this dark sky where storms follow one after another day after day? “Lebanon is suffering from a severe and prolonged economic depression,” writes the World Bank in a study published in early April, with real GDP in decline for the past three years and inflation reaching 84.3%, while 55% of the population lives below the poverty line according to the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. “Lebanon is threatened by a total and dangerous collapse […], without equivalent to what happened in Greece, Venezuela or Argentina”, warned Lebanese expert Paul Salem, president of the Washington-based Middle East Institute, in an interview with a Lebanese radio station on April 11, while meetings were being held with the IMF, the World Bank and officials of the new U.S. administration. The expert added that the Biden administration had become aware of these dangers and would be ready to act with its partners. “There is an urgent need to prevent a financial and social explosion, in coordination with the IMF. The international community is concerned,” Salem said.

Syria, in a monetary impasse

Would a prospect of an exit from the crisis in Lebanon have positive, albeit limited, effects on Syria? The Syrian pound also falls to its lowest values in history. Paradoxically, the ordeal began with the official end of the fighting, in 2018-2019. Hit by the crisis in Lebanon, the Syrian pound fell in early December 2019 on the black market to 1,000 pounds to the dollar, while the official rate published on the website of the Central Bank of Syria was 434 pounds. Even in the black years of the war, the pound had never fallen to such low levels on the parallel market.

In fact, billions of dollars from Syrian depositors were suddenly blocked by Lebanese banks, generating a shortage of dollars in the Syrian market and causing the Syrian pound to fall. Not to mention the fact that the amount of Syrian deposits placed in Lebanese banks is estimated at several billions of dollars. Bashar al-Assad himself put the figure at $40 billion (33 billion euros), although the real figure is probably much lower.

Be that as it may, at the beginning of April this year, the pound was trading on the informal market at LS 3,700 to the dollar, after hitting a low of LS 4,700 on March 17, i.e. four times less than two years ago. Syrian business circles have become accustomed to the fluctuations of their currency and attribute it to manipulation. Did President Bashar al-Assad not call for the resignation on Tuesday, April 13, at the beginning of Ramadan, of the governor of the Central Bank, Hazem Karful, to calm the waters? “A farce or just another smoke screen?” wondered a shopkeeper in Damascus, while unemployment is rising, the fuel shortage is dragging on and prices are skyrocketing all over the place.

Was the timing right, other observers wondered. Because al-Assad is in the midst of preparing for his re-election, scheduled for May 26. The truth is that the dismissal makes little sense in a devastated country, with a crushed opposition, thousands of prisoners still incarcerated, a covid epidemic that continues to wreak havoc, and attacks and attacks by untamed Islamists who once again attacked the army. And a population in utter despair.

“Yesterday a friend invited me to lunch and the bill came to the amount equivalent to a teacher’s monthly salary,” a Damascus resident who asked to remain anonymous told OrientXXI. At least some can eat, even if at an exorbitant price. Because a few hundred kilometers from the capital, in an apocalyptic landscape, some 2.8 million displaced Syrians from the war huddle in makeshift camps in Idlib province, in the northwest of the country, a once prosperous and agricultural region now under the control of a jihadist group.

“Our air is different from theirs.”

Controversy erupted on March 24 after a surprise visit to Damascus by Lebanese Health Minister Hamad Hasan. Syria gave the go-ahead to deliver 75 tons of oxygen to Lebanese hospitals, particularly for covid-19 patients, due to shortages in Lebanese factories.

“Despite the increased need for oxygen to treat Syrian patients, the response was positive […]. Relying on brother and friend [Bashar al-Assad] in times of crisis is a winning bet,” said Hassan, a minister of the Shiite Hezbollah movement in the outgoing Lebanese government.

The amount of oxygen available in Lebanon is barely enough for a single day, while intensive care units are almost saturated, with a thousand patients on ventilators, the minister said. There are two factories producing oxygen in Lebanon, and the vice-president of one of the country’s largest factories, Khaled Hadla, said that local production was insufficient and that his country imported part of its needs from Syria before Damascus limited its exports to supply its own market.

Farès Souhaid, a former Lebanese deputy on the anti-Syrian side, reacted in a tweet addressed to the Syrian president: “We don’t want your oxygen… Our air is different from yours”. The reaction inflamed the social networks, as the issue revives the deep divergences in Lebanon on the relevance or not of a normalization of relations with Syria, longed for by one part of the Lebanese and rejected by the other.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, 455,381 cases of covid-19 and 6,013 deaths have been officially recorded in Lebanon. In Syria, the governmental areas – approximately two thirds of the territory – recorded 17,743 cases and just over a thousand deaths, but in reality the balance would be much higher than the official figures.

Norway, the sleeping green giant

As one of the world’s leading exporters of natural gas, Norway faces a unique challenge in a world increasingly moving away from fossil fuels. The country has all the financial, technological and human resources it needs to thrive in a decarbonized future; what is lacking is political leadership.

LONDON – Responding to the climate emergency is difficult for everyone, but particularly for countries whose economies depend on oil extraction or production. Decarbonization is an opportunity to kick-start a green industrial revolution, but as more and more nations join this path to future prosperity, assets, technologies and capabilities that rely on fossil fuels will lose value, and that will put employment, exports and industrial innovation in oil-dominated economies at risk.

One such economy, Norway (the world’s third largest exporter of natural gas) today faces a unique challenge. Its industrial and investment structure is closely tied to hydrocarbon-based sectors and services (which in 2019 generated 36% of total exports), but the energy it consumes comes almost entirely from renewable sources (water energy conversion).

So perhaps the Norwegian economy is now ready for a green industrial transition, with the caveat that falling global demand for fossil fuels will lock in its main growth engine.

Norway’s dependence on hydrocarbons is a symptom of “Dutch disease”: the problem that occurs when one dominant sector thrives to the detriment of the others. The huge disparity in hydrocarbon investment compared to other industries attracts the most skilled professionals to the fossil fuel sector. At the same time, the extraordinary profitability of the oil and gas sector has generated excessive price and wage growth in the rest of the economy, creating difficulties for other exporters.

This is why Norway has been one of the OECD countries that since the late 1990s has lost the most international market share in the non-energy export sectors. During the last decade, Norway’s non-oil trade deficit has grown steadily and the share of the manufacturing sector in the economy has halved compared to the other Nordic countries.

To make matters worse, a recent report by the Norwegian Central Bureau of Statistics predicts that over the next decade, investment in the Norwegian energy sector will decline. While average annual investment in the sector over the previous decade exceeded NOK 170 billion (about $20 billion), between 2025 and 2034 that figure is projected to decline by about NOK 60 billion (even without oil production curtailment policies).

It is clear that Norway needs a new industrial strategy. In a recent report, we propose a way to use the technical and financial resources of the oil sector to turn Norway into a “green giant.” But the transition from oil extraction to a greener economy will not be automatic: it demands bold, but very well calibrated, action from the public sector. Government cannot micromanage the process, because it would stifle innovation, but neither can it leave it entirely to the market.

The solution is for governments to show the way with high-risk investments in the early stages, which will then be joined by private actors, with rewards for those willing to invest and innovate. In the case of Norway, an industrial strategy is needed that directs the state’s considerable financial resources towards investments in the creation of a new industrial base focused on green energy.

Norway has the world’s largest sovereign pension fund, but has not yet channeled its resources into investments in the green transition, inside or outside the country. On the contrary, Norway’s Statens Pensjonsfond Utland (SPU) is a major financier of some of the most devastating fossil fuel projects in the planning or development phase today. A recent report warns that just twelve of these projects will consume three-quarters of what remains of the world’s carbon budget, making it extremely difficult to limit global warming to 1.5 °C.

Under current Norwegian tax regulations, SPU deposits oil revenues in a fund earmarked for overseas investment. Every year Norway transfers an average of 3% of the value of the fund to the domestic economy, a sustainable withdrawal rate as it matches the expected return on the fund.

This policy has proved effective in limiting inflationary pressure from oil extraction, while providing an additional source of revenue to the state. But today Norway needs a patient and lasting financing process that makes economic diversification possible. As the current fiscal rules allow large public investments to be maintained outside the normal state budget, it is aggravating the Dutch disease by perpetuating a path dependency on oil.

But it does not have to be this way. It is possible to turn the SPU into a powerful investor with a sense of mission and presence at home and abroad. Instead of using oil revenues to recapitalize the fund, they can be directed to a new public green investment bank, acting in coordination with other public funds and agencies dedicated to the green transition.

The Norwegian national innovation system is characterized by significant state involvement. In particular, the Norwegian state owns 67% of the Norwegian oil industry’s flagship company, Equinor (formerly Statoil). But the Norwegian state-owned companies that were once key players in creating, out of nothing, the oil industrial ecosystem, have not played the same role in the green transition. Instead of reinvesting its profits in renewable energy sources, in 2019 Equinor announced that between now and 2022 it will spend $5 billion on buying back its own shares.

The impact of Covid-19 highlighted the risks of over-reliance on (volatile) energy markets. While the Danish energy giant Ørsted got through the pandemic without major inconvenience and did not halt the process of transition to renewable sources that it started a decade ago, Equinor had to cut dividends and take on debt to maintain its commitments to shareholders in a context of insufficient revenues.

Like its Danish counterpart, Equinor must become an energy giant with a sense of mission. This requires freeing its managers from the pressure to distribute dividends, returning it to the status of a fully state-owned company focused on the country’s economic future.

Mariana Mazzucato, Professor of Economics of Innovation and Public Value at University College London, is founding director of the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purposes. She is the author of The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy, The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs Private Sector Myths and, most recently, Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism.